|
Post by red dog on Jul 6, 2015 5:57:42 GMT -8
Going to have to re-build this thread from the ground up. I’ll start just like I did before: Coyote  If you have a very good print with well define toenail impressions, it is easy to tell the difference between coyote and domestic dog. Dog prints have the toenails extending out along the axis of each toe. With coyote, all nails point forward. Travis! Lay some mountain lion prints on us !
|
|
zeke
Trail Wise!
Peekaboo slot 2023
Posts: 9,820
|
Post by zeke on Jul 6, 2015 6:25:12 GMT -8
Not mine.

|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 6, 2015 8:27:05 GMT -8
|
|
Woodsie
Trail Wise!
Colorado
Posts: 272
|
Post by Woodsie on Aug 6, 2015 16:24:05 GMT -8
Just so no one gets confused  
|
|
|
Post by Coolkat on Oct 27, 2015 5:28:38 GMT -8
Here are a couple of tracks I'd like people's opinions on. The first one I THINK might be wolf. This is in Michigan' UP about a quarter mile from Lake Superior. Hiking the North Country Trail had us do a very short road walk on a small gravel road. They were in groups of four with large gaps between the groups of 4 (running I assume?) with deer tracks in a similar pattern. Now I suppose this could be a large domestic dog but wolves were almost put on the game list this year until the feds told the state no and my hiking partners heard the wolves at night.  The 2nd here we are guessing it was a Box Turtle but we weren't sure. 
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 27, 2015 6:30:08 GMT -8
The first one I THINK might be wolf. This is in Michigan' UP about a quarter mile from Lake Superior. Hiking the North Country Trail had us do a very short road walk on a small gravel road. They were in groups of four with large gaps between the groups of 4 (running I assume?) with deer tracks in a similar pattern. Now I suppose this could be a large domestic dog . . .  I'd say wolf is a good starting point, especially in a group (pack) of four — unless you have a pack of feral dogs around there. But in the case of feral dogs, I'd expect them to be different breeds and so possibly quite different canine tracks. That the animal is a canine is a fair assumption. But I don't make many assumptions based upon a single track. If possible, I follow sets of tracks some distance to see if they consistently represent the species I suspect. So in your case, identification is bound to be tentative. There is little good to be had in claiming certainty from one track. So I'd suspect wolf but take into consideration everything I was able to learn about the tracks when following them a distance — including the appearance that the tracks were traveling in a pack.
|
|
|
Post by Coolkat on Oct 27, 2015 6:58:11 GMT -8
So I'd suspect wolf but take into consideration everything I was able to learn about the tracks when following them a distance — including the appearance that the tracks appeared to be traveling in a pack. I guess if I had thought about it more I would have tried to get a picture of all 4 tracks together. I did follow these groups of tracks for about 50 feet or so until they went off into the brush. The gap between the groups of 4 I'd guess to be about 5 feet (maybe more). However, if it was a wolf it was by itself or the other others were running beside the road. I suppose the deer tracks that it appeared to be following could have just been a coincidence.
|
|
desert dweller
Trail Wise!
Power to the Peaceful...Hate does not create.
Posts: 6,290
|
Post by desert dweller on Oct 27, 2015 9:03:01 GMT -8
Black Bear track. 
|
|
desert dweller
Trail Wise!
Power to the Peaceful...Hate does not create.
Posts: 6,290
|
Post by desert dweller on Oct 27, 2015 16:42:23 GMT -8
Came across this in Caruthers Canyon in the Mojave Desert, southern California. I figure a day old. No one was camped in the area except me and a hiking buddy. Boot prints are ours. Scott was in front and didn't see the print. Human. Possibly female or juvenile. 
|
|
|
Post by Coolkat on Nov 1, 2015 10:17:00 GMT -8
There might not be enough of a track to go on but any guesses? 
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 1, 2015 13:45:41 GMT -8
There might not be enough of a track to go on but any guesses? Could you give me a size for scale? Smaller might be raccoon. Larger could be beaver.
|
|
|
Post by Coolkat on Nov 1, 2015 17:55:46 GMT -8
I'd have to go by memory now but I believe the smaller track was around 1.5 inches.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 2, 2015 9:45:36 GMT -8
I'd have to go by memory now but I believe the smaller track was around 1.5 inches. I don't think I want to play a guessing game here, and that's kind of where we end up without more information. So here are some ideas on what information to include with a photo to help other people identify the animal that made the track: [/u]: If possible, include in the photo some common item close to the track to indicate size. Such items could include coins, a standard pencil, or even a six-inch ruler. 2) Measurements: If you measure a track but don't include an item above to show scale, then indicate which measurement you are including. Front track length or width, rear track length or width. If you can't be sure of which is front or rear track, then somehow indicate clearly which track in the photo you are referring to, such as: upper right, lower right, bottom left, top left, center of photo, etc. 3) Location: You might mention state and region, such as NW Pennsylvania. Include the forest, state park, national park and so on. Or mention a nearby mapped location, such as town. 4) Habitat or ecosystem and elevation: Is it alpine Rocky Mountains, Southwest desert riparian zone, East Coast ocean beach, Appalachian lake shore at 3000 feet, evergreen forest, broad-leaf forest, aspen, oak, or pine forest, etc.? Damp sand could be found in many of those areas, but a specific animal may be rare or it may be commonplace.[/ul] It's tough enough to identify an animal from only one track in a photograph. And most answers are likely to be speculation. But to eliminate wild guessing games over a single set of tracks, it is better to include as much helpful information as you can provide. And that requires some consideration at the time you take the photo and at the time you post the photo.
|
|
|
Post by Coolkat on Nov 2, 2015 9:49:10 GMT -8
No problem. I usually try to place the handle of my trekking pole in the picture but for some reason I didn't this time. Like I said earlier probably not enough to go on. Not that it matters now but it was just south of Lake Superior in Michigan's UP.
|
|
|
Post by Coolkat on Jan 2, 2016 15:01:37 GMT -8
Here is a picture I took just a couple of days ago. I'm certain the big tracks are from a racoon but I'm open to being corrected. However it's the tracks in the upper right hand corner that interest me. Mouse? Chipmunk?  Here is closer picture of them. They are smaller than my pinky fingernail. 
|
|