Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 13, 2015 14:19:15 GMT -8
In this case it does not appear that the black bear population as a whole will be harmed. The problem is that what is being exhibited here is a wildlife commission making a token gesture for overwhelming profit motives.
Evidently the bear hunt will do nothing to lower the chance of bear attacks — even though those bear attacks provided the original excuse for the hunt. That is the token gesture. Beyond that, with bear population estimates not yet complete, the hunt is not so much a form of management but rather a means to make plenty of money for the wildlife management agency.
State wildlife agencies are state-controlled Big Business. Too often they bypass management based upon science in favor of profiteering upon the public trust. The black bear population in Florida may not be at a critical juncture. But the mode of operation and the principles involved are serious problems.
|
|
BigLoad
Trail Wise!
Pancakes!
Posts: 12,923
|
Post by BigLoad on Oct 13, 2015 16:44:49 GMT -8
If the estimate is conservative as claimed, the population numbers and the take limit are very similar to the first restart of the NJ bear hunt. After several years off it resumed again with similar limits and has since continued for a few years. The bear population has increased somewhat over the interval. At least in NJ, the actual take didn't differ too much from predictions. I doubt there will be too much impact if the NJ experience is truly comparable.
|
|
greno
Trail Wise!
Posts: 45
|
Post by greno on Oct 13, 2015 16:54:17 GMT -8
The black bear population in certain parts of Florida, especially the panhandle has exploded in the last 10 years. The first bear that I ever saw in the wild was driving through Eglin Air Force Base in the late 1990s.
|
|