Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2015 9:24:29 GMT -8
I returned to the "old" forums to see how the links were set up, and I happened upon a conversation about under-aged backpackers.
Starwalker urged participants to: He received this reply: I don't take one person's answer as representative of his generation. I don't think any one person represents any one generation. But is there some truth to what he claimed?
To me it has been refreshing to see the return here of numerous experienced backpackers who found the previous software incarnation just too messed up. This version of forum software is demonstrating itself much more capable and easy to work with.
So why would some folks stay behind with the dysfunctional software? Are we unwittingly experiencing a generational splitting between forums?
We've had several threads over the years about the need to introduce younger folks to the outdoors and to encourage them to become active in backpacking. Yet many of us also wish to keep alive a community of experienced backpackers who have gathered here for years.
How can we do both? Do we need to do something differently? Are some of us older folks a bit overbearing? Or are some of the younger folks simply averse to being around anyone over 30, or 25, or whatever?
|
|
Admin
Trail Wise!
Posts: 486
|
Post by Admin on Jul 9, 2015 9:42:53 GMT -8
While mining fore emails in the dead forum, I saw that new post. I confess, I thought it was too odd to be asking if pre-teens shoud go backpacking! Unless I read it wrong, it sounded a little "off" and I didn't send that poster an invite to come here! Bad me.
I did ask HQ if it was possible to stop anyone from adding new posts there simply because, well, do I have to say it?
|
|
|
Post by rwtb123 on Jul 9, 2015 10:55:19 GMT -8
That was actually me replying to the original poster the minor who started the thread as was starwalker.I guess just reading down the replies you lose the context of the thread.After answering as best I could I encouraged him to follow starwalkers link over here.It seemed to me in spite of all the stickies and links posted over there, there was still quite a bit of activity and they appeared mostly younger relatively speaking and probably drawn over by the website.But now I'm starting to think it might be mostly newbees to the site posting without reading the other posts about the new board.Actually,I just answered another question over there about tropical backpacking and that poster has found his way over here.
|
|
|
Post by hikinggods on Jul 9, 2015 10:55:49 GMT -8
Necrophilic?... :D
|
|
tigger
Trail Wise!
Posts: 2,547
|
Post by tigger on Jul 9, 2015 11:24:38 GMT -8
The old forum is still alive....LOL!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2015 11:55:47 GMT -8
Ever wonder about a cadaver's next-of-kin? You all telling me we're not a bunch of old fogies?
|
|
|
Post by High Sierra Fan on Jul 9, 2015 13:00:27 GMT -8
I could see "younger" as a natural result of the Backpacker.com Facebook presence.
|
|
reuben
Trail Wise!
Gonna need more Camels at the next refugio...
Posts: 11,204
|
Post by reuben on Jul 9, 2015 17:01:36 GMT -8
1. do young people use forums? Or is it FB, twitter, etc. 2. do young people backpack? They post surveys containing false premises and poorly worded questions in forums (which only geezers frequent).
|
|