Job Opening: Sommelier Specializing in Pack & Tent Pairing
Feb 15, 2016 9:37:36 GMT -8
toejam likes this
Post by Westy on Feb 15, 2016 9:37:36 GMT -8
My primary backpack is an Arc’Teryx Bora 50 which has provided great service. In 2009 I upgraded the 1-person tent to the Hilleberg Akto. Have been very pleased with this pairing. It’s a perfect set-up for trips ≤ 120 miles, 8-10 days.
Last year, we decided to do an authentic long-distance backpacking excursion with re-supply points. The activity is way different, due to the extended duration and mileage. Weight and pack volume reduction becomes acutely critical for an enjoyable experience.
To prepare, we tested all of our gear and made assessments based on a standalone formula. Four backpacks later we selected the Hyperlite Mountain Gear Southwest 3400 (55L). By coincidence it paired well with our 2-person tent selection, the Hilleberg Anjan 2. Total field satisfaction during a long distance application.
Now planning a CDT thru-hike a couple of years out. In the meantime have a 100 mile smoke & cinders, slog and summit 10 day outing booked this summer. Pre-trip planning specifies using a 1-person tent. Thinking ahead, seeking a 1-person tent upgrade to realize further future weight reduction. Looking to replace the Atko for the CDT thru-hike and pair with the Southwest 3400
Have been studying, comparing, reviewing, reading forum comments etc. to help make the proper long distance tent decision. Came very close to placing an order for the Hilleberg Enan, which is the no-fat version of the Akto. Decided to hold off spending and continue research as the need is not imminent. The Atko and a little extra weight won’t make a difference for this season’s outings with a 1-person tent requirement.
The Hyperlight Mountain Gear Southwest 3400 was so terrific I planned to pair it with the Akto for the 100 mile trek.
Last night decided to simul-pack to further understand pairing the Akto with the Southwest 3400. I’m a fussy packer, no gear strapped to the outside of the pack other than an ice axe or crampons. Prefered pack technique has the tent rolled or moshed horizontally at the bottom of the pack. No deviation.
The findings….the Akto has 14” fiberglass rods, (2) @ on both the front and rear sides. The Southwest 3400 has an internal back width dimension of 10-½”. My go, no-go gage test resulted in a non-conformity. Corrective action required. This also potentially negates an Enan acquisition. Enan has 2 fiberglass rods vs. 4, but length dimensions are the same.
The Akto rods are fabricated into the tent, they can be removed, packed separately and assembled in the field, but at great inconvenience. To do so will inevitably generate a broad bandwidth of foul language. This alternative packing concept is a… hassle too far. Alternative fails. Back to the Bora 50-Akto pairing.
The point being….. in your gear selection process, you may want to consider your Pack & Tent Pairing.
Last year, we decided to do an authentic long-distance backpacking excursion with re-supply points. The activity is way different, due to the extended duration and mileage. Weight and pack volume reduction becomes acutely critical for an enjoyable experience.
To prepare, we tested all of our gear and made assessments based on a standalone formula. Four backpacks later we selected the Hyperlite Mountain Gear Southwest 3400 (55L). By coincidence it paired well with our 2-person tent selection, the Hilleberg Anjan 2. Total field satisfaction during a long distance application.
Now planning a CDT thru-hike a couple of years out. In the meantime have a 100 mile smoke & cinders, slog and summit 10 day outing booked this summer. Pre-trip planning specifies using a 1-person tent. Thinking ahead, seeking a 1-person tent upgrade to realize further future weight reduction. Looking to replace the Atko for the CDT thru-hike and pair with the Southwest 3400
Have been studying, comparing, reviewing, reading forum comments etc. to help make the proper long distance tent decision. Came very close to placing an order for the Hilleberg Enan, which is the no-fat version of the Akto. Decided to hold off spending and continue research as the need is not imminent. The Atko and a little extra weight won’t make a difference for this season’s outings with a 1-person tent requirement.
The Hyperlight Mountain Gear Southwest 3400 was so terrific I planned to pair it with the Akto for the 100 mile trek.
Last night decided to simul-pack to further understand pairing the Akto with the Southwest 3400. I’m a fussy packer, no gear strapped to the outside of the pack other than an ice axe or crampons. Prefered pack technique has the tent rolled or moshed horizontally at the bottom of the pack. No deviation.
The findings….the Akto has 14” fiberglass rods, (2) @ on both the front and rear sides. The Southwest 3400 has an internal back width dimension of 10-½”. My go, no-go gage test resulted in a non-conformity. Corrective action required. This also potentially negates an Enan acquisition. Enan has 2 fiberglass rods vs. 4, but length dimensions are the same.
The Akto rods are fabricated into the tent, they can be removed, packed separately and assembled in the field, but at great inconvenience. To do so will inevitably generate a broad bandwidth of foul language. This alternative packing concept is a… hassle too far. Alternative fails. Back to the Bora 50-Akto pairing.
The point being….. in your gear selection process, you may want to consider your Pack & Tent Pairing.
