daveb
Trail Wise!
Posts: 589
|
Post by daveb on Feb 9, 2016 14:38:29 GMT -8
Newbie question here. I'm looking at purchasing the Big Agness Copper Spur UL2 and was wondering is someone could help me understand the specs here. What is Trail weight, packed weight and fast fly weight? I'm assuming packed weight is the trail weight combined with the footprint weight?
|
|
greno
Trail Wise!
Posts: 45
|
Post by greno on Feb 9, 2016 15:15:03 GMT -8
Ill take a stab, packed weight is fly, tent, and footprint, fly is fly and poles and trail weight is no footprint. That is half a couple of pounds less than my lightest packed weight tent and I want a new one very badly.
|
|
|
Post by JRinGeorgia on Feb 9, 2016 15:20:14 GMT -8
From the Big Agnes product page for the Copper Spur UL2: Note: We list several weights for our tents to aid your product research. Trail weight refers to poles, fly and tent body. Packed weight includes poles, fly, tent body, stakes, guy lines, stuff sacks, instructions, and packaging. Fast Fly weight refers to the poles, tent fly and accessory Fast Fly footprint.www.bigagnes.com/Products/Detail/Tent/copperspurul2
|
|
daveb
Trail Wise!
Posts: 589
|
Post by daveb on Feb 9, 2016 15:22:38 GMT -8
Thanks guys.
I almost made it to the bottom of the product info. (I obviously have ADD)
|
|
rebeccad
Trail Wise!
Writing like a maniac
Posts: 12,688
|
Post by rebeccad on Feb 10, 2016 8:28:38 GMT -8
That last bit, about "fast fly" refers also to the fact that you can use the fly and footprint together (with the poles, obviously) to make a lighter shelter when bugs aren't an issue. I did that with ours (we have that tent and are about to get a new one, after minor disasters to the current tent) two years ago when I needed a solo shelter in September. It worked pretty well, but I had two issues: it was drafty (and my bag marginal for the conditions), and when it rained it took a lot of careful work (some in the middle of the night) to prevent water running in atop the footprint. But--it made a shelter at a weight that I could carry solo.
For use with the tent body, the footprint isn't necessary, though it will make your tent last longer, at least in theory.
Stakes aren't included in the trail weight because people like to swap those out. You do need to carry at least 4 stakes, to stake out the fly (not 100% essential, but you won't get good air flow or any vestibules without, though of course you can find substitutes if you've forgotten the spikes).
|
|
daveb
Trail Wise!
Posts: 589
|
Post by daveb on Feb 10, 2016 12:02:21 GMT -8
Thanks Rebecca, I appreciate you all taking the time to explain these things to me. I'll admit my head is spinning with all the new lingo and knowledge about these tents and the different weights weren't making sense to me. I was looking at the Big Agness and doing some comparisons to several of the tents in neneboricua's thread. I've got allot of research to do!
|
|
Westy
Trail Wise!
Diagnosed w/Post-Trail Transition Syndrome
Posts: 1,960
|
Post by Westy on Feb 10, 2016 12:41:09 GMT -8
knowledge about these tents and the different weights weren't making sense to me. Don't feel like the Lone Ranger!
|
|
amaruq
Trail Wise!
Call me Little Spoon
Posts: 1,264
|
Post by amaruq on Feb 10, 2016 13:44:56 GMT -8
I'll admit my head is spinning with all the new lingo and knowledge about these tents and the different weights weren't making sense to me. We've all been there. Some of us twice!
|
|
rebeccad
Trail Wise!
Writing like a maniac
Posts: 12,688
|
Post by rebeccad on Feb 10, 2016 22:30:11 GMT -8
I still feel that way about the new tent options out there. I studied that other thread closely, as we are replacing the defunct tent. But BA offered us 50% off a new one if they can have the old one for parts, and that was a deal we couldn't pass up.
|
|
|
Post by dayhiker on Feb 11, 2016 9:38:25 GMT -8
That last bit, about "fast fly" refers also to the fact that you can use the fly and footprint together (with the poles, obviously) to make a lighter shelter when bugs aren't an issue. I did that with ours (we have that tent and are about to get a new one, after minor disasters to the current tent) two years ago when I needed a solo shelter in September. It worked pretty well, but I had two issues: it was drafty (and my bag marginal for the conditions), and when it rained it took a lot of careful work (some in the middle of the night) to prevent water running in atop the footprint. But--it made a shelter at a weight that I could carry solo. Water rolling in, would be akin to camping under a tarp? ie without a Bathtub floor, but there are other problems: Outdoor Gear: The Follies of Fast-Pitching with a Footprint Although manufacturers tout their tents' fast-pitch weight (using an optional footprint with poles and a rain fly) we don't believe this type of shelter is viable for backpacking in wind or rain. Compared to floorless tents, fast-pitching has two significant limitations: (1) it's much weaker, and (2) it's much less weather resistant. Most double-wall tents have a specific inner tent that supports the pole structure and has a 4-8" waterproof walls that protects against splashback and horizontally blown rain. Footprints are cut to match the inner tent's floor dimensions, so if fast-pitching a tent in the rain, we've found that water almost always lands on the footprint, creeps inward, and gets us wet. Grommets in the footprint provide the support for the poles, so you can't fast-pitch without a footprint or roll the footprint back from the dripping rain. Furthermore, since most outer tents attach to the poles from the outside with velcro, fast pitching is inherently weak, and made weaker by the fact that many outer tents have no means to connect to the poles— they may only clip the footprint—and, therefore, guying the outer tent out is completely useless. For these reasons we don't believe that fast-pitching a tent is viable for serious backpacking. It's largely just a marketing gimmick. However, the Hilleberg Anjan and MSR Hubba Hubba NX are dedicated pole-supported tents in our review finalists that can be used without their inner tents in significant rain or wind and can be pitched in a floor-less configuration. We like this floor-less configuration because it is stronger than the typical "fast-pitch" and does not require purchasing a separate footprint. ==== This is sort of what I was thinking, in fact I worried about using my BetaLite, since my sleeping bag and me could easily roll out the side of the tent! It has an optional bathtub floor you can bring but is about as heavy as the BetaBug (inner tent). I winter camp or use in late fall with it, it doesn't taper at the feet like some of my prior tents , and my ground cloth can be sized to be well inside the tent, still rolling rain might be a problem. One time I camped with it and the inner and sleet piled up on one side, and then rain water behind that! But I could see fast fly if you would cowboy camp, probably good for a light short rain.
|
|
rebeccad
Trail Wise!
Writing like a maniac
Posts: 12,688
|
Post by rebeccad on Feb 11, 2016 9:50:47 GMT -8
The BA footprint has the grommets on tabs (which I replicated when I made one myself), so that the footprint is enough smaller than the fly that it doesn't drip directly on it. The lack of clips to hold the poles to the fly didn't seem to matter, as long as it was well staked (the pole rig is stable on its own). We had at least one very windy night and the rig was solid. It was just drafty. The big different, I think, with that approach vs. a tarp set-up is that you can't adjust to have the edges of the fly reach the ground. They are designed with a gap at the bottom, and a gap you have. Thus the draftiness. The water issue I had was that my tent site wasn't perfect--it sloped a little. So, with the ground pretty hard-packed from lots of use, water ran downhill toward me, and I had to build little ditches and dams to direct it around the tent.
As for rolling out the side--yeah, I would not want to try that fast-pitch option for 2. For one person on a 2-man groundcloth, it was fine--I had enough room to stay mostly on the groundcloth. But two people would be lapping over the edges (the tent really is just barely wider than 2 thermarests).
I would not use that option if expecting a lot of bad weather. But as I would not go into the Sierra and expect no rain at all, it's a fairly light bit of insurance. In my case, it was also a bit of privacy as I was hiking with 2 men unrelated to me.
|
|
rebeccad
Trail Wise!
Writing like a maniac
Posts: 12,688
|
Post by rebeccad on Feb 11, 2016 11:29:22 GMT -8
BTW--Nice customer service moment. BA has accepted our sadly beaten tent and given us 50% off a replacement. I call that generous. The new tent is a little nicer and a little lighter, which is a bonus
|
|