BigLoad
Trail Wise!
Pancakes!
Posts: 12,911
|
Post by BigLoad on Feb 24, 2020 17:32:54 GMT -8
Well, rescued on the way back. I wonder if it might be better to remove the bus.
|
|
|
Post by Lamebeaver on Feb 24, 2020 17:56:57 GMT -8
I wonder if it might be better to remove the bus. The short answer is "yes". The longer answer is "yes, ASAP!"
|
|
gabby
Trail Wise!
Posts: 4,537
|
Post by gabby on Feb 24, 2020 19:00:49 GMT -8
I've been thinking this ever since watching the movie and reading the book.
It's either remove the bus, attempt to stamp out all recognizable remnants of the site, or fine those who go out unprepared, the largest fine being, of course, death due to stupidity. Why are people like this? After reading "The English Patient" and watching the movie version of the book, I was more interested in the source of the information Ondaatje used to construct the characters in the novel, though the locales are pretty interesting and are "romanticized" in both the book and movie.
Turns out that much the same sort of response came after the movie, "The English Patient", and the Egyptian government has had to close off access to the "Cave of Swimmers" area. People were actually stealing pieces of the cave drawings as well as spraying them with water to make them stand out in photos. Such damage by "movie tourists" is unconscionable. But, I guess, we all have to enlarge our own small egos by associating with the popular personalities of others. We go to the concerts, and then we buy the tee shirt to show that, yes, we were actually there. It seems to run deeply enough in human nature that we're all more-or-less susceptible.
|
|
walkswithblackflies
Trail Wise!
Resident terrorist-supporting eco-freak bootlicker
Posts: 6,926
|
Post by walkswithblackflies on Feb 25, 2020 5:50:34 GMT -8
I wonder if it might be better to remove the bus. Yes. And let's close Joshua Tree, Half Dome, Angels Landing, and all beaches while we're at it. Can't have anyone possibly getting hurt. Whatever happened to personal responsibility?
|
|
reuben
Trail Wise!
Gonna need more Camels at the next refugio...
Posts: 11,141
|
Post by reuben on Feb 25, 2020 6:36:35 GMT -8
Whatever happened to personal responsibility? It went out the window with the arrival of cell phones.
|
|
|
Post by bradmacmt on Feb 25, 2020 7:12:35 GMT -8
Yes. And let's close Joshua Tree, Half Dome, Angels Landing, and all beaches while we're at it. Can't have anyone possibly getting hurt. Whatever happened to personal responsibility? While I agree with you about personal responsibility, the bus is trash... those places you cite by comparison are not. I would also add, those drawn to the bus like moths are likely not experienced outdoors people. We've got better things to go see...
|
|
BigLoad
Trail Wise!
Pancakes!
Posts: 12,911
|
Post by BigLoad on Feb 25, 2020 18:27:10 GMT -8
I wonder if it might be better to remove the bus. Yes. And let's close Joshua Tree, Half Dome, Angels Landing, and all beaches while we're at it. Can't have anyone possibly getting hurt. Whatever happened to personal responsibility?
The bus attracts people who don't act responsibly. I'm not suggesting that the area be closed, but it might attract fewer irresponsible people without the bus.
|
|
|
Post by johntpenca on Feb 25, 2020 19:09:24 GMT -8
I dunno BigLoad. I see your logic, but you can't stop stupid. If not the bus, it would be something else. Let Darwin's law decide.
|
|
|
Post by Lamebeaver on Feb 25, 2020 19:10:58 GMT -8
Yes. And let's close Joshua Tree, Half Dome, Angels Landing, and all beaches while we're at it. Can't have anyone possibly getting hurt. The deaths in these places pale to those in large cities.....and on highways. Just saying....
|
|
|
Post by bradmacmt on Feb 26, 2020 6:27:01 GMT -8
I dunno BigLoad. I see your logic, but you can't stop stupid. If not the bus, it would be something else. Let Darwin's law decide. One of the hallmark's of being human is we live in an interrelated culture where we create laws and act in ways that improve the quality of life for ourselves and our fellow humans. These laws and actions exist to "save us from ourselves." And in the case of this bus, to save the misguided from themselves (just like a seatbelt law). A lot dopey chit is glibly done in the name of Darwin...
My guess is the city/borough doesn't want to spend the money to haul the bus out, and/or they like the tourists drawn to the area because of it. So in either case money is more important than protecting fellow humans. Another hallmark of humanness...
|
|
|
Post by johntpenca on Feb 26, 2020 7:24:46 GMT -8
These laws and actions exist to "save us from ourselves." That is what I have a problem with. It's one thing to have laws that protect us as a population from other people's idiocy/foolish acts (DUI, speed limits, etc.). It's another to have laws or other regulations to inhibit our ability to choose what activities we wish to pursue. Admittedly, my reference to Darwin was glib. The linked article did not give enough information to assume the party rescued was unprepared or otherwise over their heads. Personally, I don't have a dog in the fight. Leave the bus or remove it. Doesn't really matter to me. It would be simple enough to send a big military helo in to lift it out as part of a training mission.
|
|
|
Post by autumnmist on Feb 26, 2020 8:29:47 GMT -8
I would think some entrepreneur or financially oriented individual would suggest creating a smaller "wilderness" area, such as a park, to replicate the bus's location, haul or lift it out, and charge people to walk around a mini forest and visit the bus. If people want to see it, at least make some money from it instead of putting out funds for rescues.
|
|
gabby
Trail Wise!
Posts: 4,537
|
Post by gabby on Feb 26, 2020 16:39:28 GMT -8
I don't think a bunch of new laws is the answer either. But someone could come up with a creative solution, maybe. I like autumnmist 's idea, because it's sort of "self-financing", and the "tourists" could say they'd been there. (I guess) But you'd still need a fence or some kind of barrier to keep people from going inside the bus, or stealing the tires, or something. (I don't like the idea of barriers either.) I remember walking up a trail in Hawaii while driving along the Hana road on Maui as a tourist myself. From a bridge across from a relatively large waterfall, there were a few dozen people down there, at the bottom of the falls, getting wet - granted - on a somewhat hot day, in clear violation of a sign which prohibited anyone from even walking into the river, and against the even more reasonable prohibition, for safety's sake, against standing directly under a waterfall - something which is posted at virtually every waterfall in Hawaii - for the good reason that rocks are, in fact, washed down watercourses all the time. Standing under a waterfall at the bottom of a hundred foot (or better) waterfall is not a very good idea. But it's something a lot of idiots (or ill-informed persons) do all the time.Look at these idiots at Manoa Falls, which is, BTW, a very nice hike through the jungle, even if it is pretty crowded. Suggestion: don't go if it has rained the day before, or anytime recently. You will encounter mud and slippery surfaces. There are, however, no signs warning you not to go, just warnings about watching for "slippery footing". (There's a stream next to the path, and it's sometimes a few feet, sometimes 10' or so, down to it.) Yes, there IS a sign. In fact, there's more than one, but that doesn't seem to stop anyone. There were a dozen people in the water the day I hiked there.: To view the signs and photos in a larger version so you can actually read them, you can right click on the image and select "view image". Such signs are everywhere in Hawaii. I never visited any waterfall, however, which didn't have at least a half dozen people in the pool at the bottom. A fuzzy photo of Seven Pools, at the end of Hana road. Here, there are signs warning that the source of the water in the Seven Pools is near the upper reaches of the Haleakala volcano massif: that is, a strong rain storm near the top of Haleakala, which might have no local warning, could cause a sudden flood through Seven Pools, washing anyone there at the time out to sea. (The cliffs on both sides of the pools area are steep, so there would be no climbing out at the last second!) Should you survive the battering currents and be washed out to sea, a sign I saw there warns that gray sharks immediately off the discharge area will be waiting to eat you.
You think that discourages tourists? Uh, no.
|
|
|
Post by bradmacmt on Feb 27, 2020 6:20:22 GMT -8
2 people have been killed trying to reach the bus, and many more than just these five have been injured or had to be rescued.
Seems like the Denali Borough is thinking of moving the bus to make it "safer" to get to by putting it on the East side of the Talkeetna River.
So my theory of human financial greed is confirmed...
|
|
swmtnbackpacker
Trail Wise!
Back but probably posting soon under my real name ... Rico Sauve
Posts: 4,886
|
Post by swmtnbackpacker on Feb 27, 2020 6:57:20 GMT -8
Whatever happened to personal responsibility? It went out the window with the arrival of cell phones. People in the outdoors were getting in trouble before cell phones however. That’s why the bus is still there (monument to stupidity but also doing ones own thing).
|
|